The same can be said of capitalism. When capital accumulation became the dominant motor of productive activity in contrast to subsistence production, wage labour tended to become the dominant form of labour control. Yet these apparently 'peaceful' production-relations, based on mechanisms of economic coercion (structural violence), could be built up only on the base of a tremendous expansion of the predatory mode of acquisition. Direct and violent acquisition of gold and silver and other products, mainly in Hispanic America, and of producers--first the Indians in Latin America and later African slaves--proved to be the most 'productive' activity in what has been described as the period of 'primitive accumulation'.
Thus capitalism did not do away with the former 'savage' forms of control over human productive capacity, it rather reinforced and generalized them...
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
Maria Mies, Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Divison of Labour pages 67-68
Labels:
-maria mies,
capitalism,
centralization,
commodities,
continuity,
economy,
empire,
feminism,
history,
power,
progress,
violence,
work
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment